Secondly, another aspect of the video that stood out is that the narrator often refers to science as a 'method'. Again this argument relates to my previous point that science is not a single entity. Science is multi-faceted and if anything, commonly consists of a multitude of methods. A simple example is that in making a cake, there can be a number of approaches and the results may be different each time. There could be a recommended recipe to follow, but you will never know if there is a better way if you do not try other approaches. Check out Chapter One (The Nature of Science) of Science for all Americans that highlights some important characteristics inherent to understanding science as a discipline and common misconceptions people can have about science. Some examples of these characteristics of science as a discipline are that science demands evidence, science demands a mixture of logic and imagination, science tries to identify and avoid bias, and science is not authoritarian. Prof. Joe Schwarcz, a public figure on scientific literacy, highlights some common misconceptions people can have through some interesting examples.
Despite my points above, the question of why science is important is still a very worthwhile question to attempt to answer in that it clarifies what you see science as and in turn, how you may interpret it. It is an exceptionally important question to answer in relation to education, where students can commonly see science as irrelevant and lacking little connection to everyday life. Students have the right to ask such questions and should be encouraged to. Only then can students truly begin to appreciate what they are learning (the affective domain as described as part of Bloom's taxonomy).
Images taken from http://opencage.info/pics.e/large_9888.asp and http://www.fotopedia.com/items/flickr-2200500024
No comments:
Post a Comment